Skip to main content
VIDEO FEATURE: Heck Debates Malcolm on Porn & Santorum 

THE OFFICIAL BLOG OF THE PETER HECK RADIO SHOW
a service of Attaboy Productions, Inc.

Wednesday, November 30 2011

Hear the audio version here (segments older than 3 weeks may be unavailable)

 

The New York Times typically has headlines that make you do a double take if you are a person of sound mind and body.  But the one that recently read, "Boys swimming on girls' teams find success - then draw jeers," probably gave some people whiplash.  Yet, unlike many Times' headlines that are as misleading as possible, this one pretty much told you what was happening:

It tells of the Massachusetts South Division's fall swimming and diving championships for girls - whose record in the 50-yard freestyle was broken by the winner: Will Higgins.

 

Will is not for Wilma, because Will is a boy.

 

So what is a boy doing competing in a championship race for girls? Will's Norwood High School athletic director, Brian Mcdonough, while congratulating Will Higgins, was asked about Will competing in a girl's swimming contest.

 

He replied: "I didn't want to get into that."

 

Will Higgins is a high-school senior who is among "roughly two dozen boys competing on girls teams in Massachusetts - because their schools do not have boys swimming programs. The boys are able to disregard this one-gender-only rule because of the open access amendment to the Massachusetts Constitution. That amendment was voted into law in the 1970s. It mandates that boys and girls must be afforded equal access to athletics."

So here we have yet another consequence of the left's ridiculous crusade to break down any and all distinctions between the sexes.  Whether it's in the name of transgenderism or gender neutrality or equal rights or political correctness or whatever, the left would have us believe that segregating between the sexes is an abomination.

 

Now, typically we see this sword cut only in one direction: it is used to reinforce the idea to girls that they are every bit as good as boys and that boys can't do anything that girls can't do.  Who are we to keep girls off the football team or wrestling team?  And shove your chivalrous attitudes, equal rights mean no more car doors opened, no more "protecting" the weaker sex, no more special immunities and privileges for a woman's workload. 

 

But in this case, the very law being used to elevate women has been applied equally to the other sex.  And surprise, surprise, it has upset a few people along the way:

The Times goes on to quote Sarah Hooper, a senior at Needham High, who is the fourth-fastest female entrant and who finds the situation difficult to swallow.

 

"It's really frustrating to see how athletic directors and school administrators aren't doing anything," she said. "They really aren't advocating for us. I understand there isn't an opportunity for these boys, but it infuriates me that they can't combine two schools' boys to create one team or have them compete in separate meets. The way it is now, the boys are taking recognition away from girls who've worked hard and deserve it."

 

"Cooler heads are not found in the bleachers. At the Bay State conference meet earlier this month, Hooper's father, Eric, lost his composure after watching her get beaten by boys. While waiting for her after the race, he said to her male competitors, 'Good job for beating the girls.'

The school was pretty ticked off with this Hooper guy, and punished him by threatening to keep him out of the stands at his daughter's sectional meet, until he put his hat in his hand, prostrated himself before the forces of political correctness, and apologized for HIS mistake.  Pretty incredible, isn't it?

 

Boys now swimming on the girls' swimming team and setting state records in the process.  Of course, don't you think that denying the opportunity to set girls' records to boys from schools that happen to have a boys team is unfair and inconsistent?  Why should only some boys be allowed to set girls' records? 

 

It kind of brings up an interesting possibility, doesn't it?  What happens if enough of the boys at this Will Higgins' school decide to join the team.  And being bigger and stronger than the girls, pretty soon, the girls are no longer on the team.  The girls' team that is...now filled with boys.  Maybe those girls would need to band together and go start a boys' team?

 

Give liberals control of government, and this is what your society becomes.

Posted by: Peter Heck AT 05:09 pm   |  Permalink   |  2 Comments  |  Email
Comments:
I think it is sad that boys are being lowered again in sports as because they can beat a girl. Girls are made different from boys and God bless the difference. To separate the sports is not degrading, it only RIGHT. I hope parents will stand up for their girls and possibly form their own girls' swimming team!
Posted by Linda Demorest on 01/01/2012 18:33:01
We have a daughter who was a national caliber synchronized swimmer; while at the Olympic training ctr. she and female peers were humbled by a boy there who naturally had more strength. The synchro sport scores its swimmers according to power-performance metrics, thus boys tend to have an edge over girls, and his presence did keep a girl somewhere off the otherwise all-female squad. Struck some as odd, but kid's father backed him 100%. Still, not enough money OR interest for duplicate M/F programs. Re NYT article, seems like cheapest solution for schools would be to simply post separate boys' & girls' records like the club teams do; life goes on.
Posted by Kevin Green on 01/23/2012 12:22:59

Post comment
Name
 *
Email Address

Message
(max 750 characters)
*
* Required Fields
Note: All comments are subject to approval. Your comment will not appear until it has been approved.

*
*
*
click between 3-5 pm ET
*
*