Is the First Lady a bully? Given the nonsense standards being advanced by the homosexual lobby, yes she is.
Linda Harvey's incredible commentary on this idea shows the idiocy behind the movement's strategy, by spectacularly applying it to First Lady Michelle:
It's certainly understandable that people are grieving the loss of precious young lives. And yes, the hallways are increasingly uncivil in public schools. But the demands are over-the-top as the "gay" lobby intends to use the tragedies to silence all unwanted opinions and to make sweeping claims not supported by hard evidence.
Why are we turning a blind eye, then, to another potentially explosive kind of rhetoric: the anti-chubby messages sent every day in our schools, now encouraged by our first lady?
Michelle Obama's "Let's Move" initiative describes the health risks of childhood obesity as well as associated low self-esteem and social stigmatization. The research shows that overweight kids are at very high risk for being bullied.
OK, then, can we get some "sensitivity training" arranged for the first lady next? And all the health teachers? The cafeteria workers may need close review. And then, out in the community, Weight Watchers and Jenny Craig? We have to police this thing before it gets out of control.
The overweight kids are frequently bullied, but lack George Soros-funded lobbying groups. They don't have "pride" parades. And to think even the nation's first lady is making them feel bad by her biased rhetoric. Lose weight? Aren't you just creating a "climate of hate" for the bullies?
Every time a teacher at school mentions calorie counting, or recommends fresh fruits and vegetables, the heavy kids slink down in their seats. Here it comes ... more ammunition for the pokes and jabs out in the hall later. "Hey, tubbo!" "How about some broccoli, Fatso?" "Oink, oink!" And lunch is a living nightmare, day after day. So mean!
I've been saying repeatedly that the homosexual lobby is using Stalinesque tactics of paranoid demonization of anyone who doesn't support their agenda in lockstep. But Harvey's column does an excellent job of highlighting a new danger to their evil.
If those who agree with their end goal give credibility and legitimacy to these tactics, even they will find themselves subject to them. So should we enroll you in your necessary sensitivity training now, Michelle?