VIDEO FEATURE: Heck Debates Malcolm on Porn & Santorum 

THE OFFICIAL BLOG OF THE PETER HECK RADIO SHOW
a service of Attaboy Productions, Inc.

Tuesday, 22 May 2012

Listen

Well here’s one that absolutely stunned me.  You might remember during the 2008 presidential campaign, no network was more notorious for being in the tank for Obama than CNN.  Perhaps that’s not fair.  MSNBC was obviously part of his campaign structure, but I just even count them as being a legitimate network.  CNN at least attempts to maintain this façade of being unbiased.  Absurd.

In 2008 it was CNN that boasted Anderson Cooper and his embarrassing dismissal of the Jeremiah Wright controversy no less than 15 times in one short segment.  It was CNN that was mercilessly mocked by Saturday Night Live for being so in love with Obama – to the point that Hillary Clinton even gave them a hat tip in the midst of a debate with The Chosen One.  And it was CNN that had Campbell Brown cheerfully playing the same, “No Obama Controversial Relationship Mentioned Here” game, while at the same time going overboard to cover hard-hitting news stories like Sarah Palin’s wardrobe.

So imagine my surprise when I saw an absolutely incredibly honest piece from Brown that appeared in the New York Times over the weekend.  Brown was hammering Obama for his condescending attitude towards women.  Behold, and be equally amazed:

WHEN I listen to President Obama speak to and about women, he sometimes sounds too paternalistic for my taste. In numerous appearances over the years — most recently at the Barnard graduation — he has made reference to how women are smarter than men. It’s all so tired, the kind of fake praise showered upon those one views as easy to impress.…

Some women are smarter than men and some aren’t. But to suggest to women that they deserve dominance instead of equality is at best a cheap applause line.

Holy cow.  No wonder she left CNN.  Brown has just committed what Rush Limbaugh sometimes calls a “random act of journalism.”  It’s honest and it’s exactly right.  Some women are smarter than men, some aren’t.  The ones that are deserve positions of authority not simply because they are women, but because they have worked hard and have achieved it.  I hate to tell Ms. Brown this, but that’s exactly what conservatives have been saying, arguing and promoting for decades. 

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK

Then why aren’t the conservatives known as the feminists?  Because feminism has been hijacked by a group of liberals who redefine the word to mean “supports abortion.”  Brown continued, unleashing an arrow aimed at the heart of Obama’s ridiculous socialist propaganda web piece on the “Life of Julia”:

The women I know who are struggling in this economy couldn’t be further from the fictional character of Julia, presented in Mr. Obama’s Web ad, “The Life of Julia,” a silly and embarrassing caricature based on the assumption that women look to government at every meaningful phase of their lives for help.

At this point of the article, I was on my feet.  My stunned feet, but my feet no less.  She then brought the hammer down at the end, calling out The Chosen One for what he – no one else – has made of his presidency:

The struggling women in my life all laughed when I asked them if contraception or abortion rights would be a major factor in their decision about this election. For them, and for most other women, the economy overwhelms everything else.

[T]he promise of [Obama's] campaign four years ago has given way to something else — a failure to connect with tens of millions of Americans, many of them women, who feel economic opportunity is gone and are losing hope. In an effort to win them back, Mr. Obama is trying too hard. He’s employing a tone that can come across as grating and even condescending. He really ought to drop it. Most women don’t want to be patted on the head or treated as wards of the state. They simply want to be given a chance to succeed based on their talent and skills.

Indeed, and this is likely why a new CBS News/New York Times poll found women now favoring Romney over Obama.

If you were looking for evidence that Obama and the left had utterly failed in their attempt to hit Republicans for a “War on Women,” and that the attempt had, in fact, backfired, you just read it.

Posted by: Peter Heck AT 06:09 pm   |  Permalink   |  6 Comments  |  Email
Comments:
Well, I guess we'll see in November if Obama has "utterly failed" to appeal to female voters. Something tells me gender gap ain't going away any time soon.
Posted by Rosie the Riveter on 05/23/2012 15:26:22
I think the point of this post wasn't that there wouldn't be a gender gap, or that Obama would lose the woman vote. I think it was exactly what it said: that the "War on Women" meme had backfired. But strawmen are always fun to attack, so have at it!
Posted by GD on 05/23/2012 21:36:24
Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification. So the gender gap won't close and Obama will still win the female vote, BUT their strategy to appeal to women voters has backfired. With logic like that, I see why you agree with Heck.
Posted by Rosie the Riveter on 05/24/2012 21:03:46
Geez. Okay, I'll walk you through this slowly. The gender gap had closed in recent polls - some even showing Romney leading among women. In a panic, liberals launched this fake "War on Women" nonsense trying to scare women into loving Obama again. Campbell Brown's piece is a sign that such a strategy didn't work. Obama may still win the women vote, but it won't be because of this ridiculous "War on Women" crusade. That failed. In fact, it backfired. I am sometimes amazed how dense the minds of liberals really are. Hope this helped penetrate the ooze.
Posted by GD on 05/24/2012 23:49:29
"The gender gap had closed in recent polls-- even showing Romney leading among women." Ummmm, among women, Obama leads Romney by 19 percentage points. Classic GD response, though-- resorting to mistruths and name calling when the facts aren't in your favor. Keep personifying the stereotype, dude!
Posted by Rosie the Riveter on 05/25/2012 10:18:49
Classic. Let's walk slowly again, because you seem to be struggling here. As I stated, "some [polls] even showing Romney leading among women." As you see here: http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/washington-secrets/2012/05/shock-poll-romney-now-leads-among-women/613771 the CBS/NY Times poll showed Romney leading among women. Try tuning into something other than MSNBC or read something other than the DailyKos, Rosie. Talk about personifying the stereotype. Thanks for the assist.
Posted by GD on 05/25/2012 13:44:36

Post comment
Name
 *
Email Address

Message
(max 750 characters)
*
Verify image below
*
* Required Fields
Note: All comments are subject to approval. Your comment will not appear until it has been approved.

*
*
*
click between 3-5 pm ET
*
*